gala-header

Tort Museum 2017 Gala

On April 13, 2017, Mark Green and Deni Frand hosted a Gala in  their Manhattan to honor Phil Donahue and Dick Cavett and to benefit the American Museum of Tort Law.

Enjoy a few videos from the evening.

Spring ReAwakening – If It Doesn’t Please the Court

  • Tort Museum Spring Re-Awakening

    One day, two events.

    Saturday June 3, 2017

  1. 1


The American Museum of Tort Law (AMTL), is proud to welcome Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Matt Wuerker, and Hall of Fame The New Yorker magazine cartoonist/illustrator Barry Blitt for a special daylong Program – ‘If It Doesn’t Please the Court: Two Ink-Stained Wretches on the Art of Political Satire.’ Consumer protection pioneer and AMTL Founder Ralph Nader, will join Blitt and Wuerker on the Program.

Public Event

1:00 p.m. Blitt and Wuerker will be joined by Ralph Nader to speak on the Art of Political Satire. Blitt and Wuerker will talk about their creative processes; how they transform news into art and satire; and will show examples of their work. It will be a fascinating look into the minds of two of the leading illustrators of our time. The Museum will be open after the conclusion of the program at 2:30 pm, until 5:30 pm for visitors.

Purchase Tickets

If It Doesn’t Please the Court: Two Ink-Stained Wretches on the Art of Political Satire

 11:00 a.m. CARTOON AND ILLUSTRATION WORKSHOP led by Pulitzer Prize winning cartoonist Matt Wuerker and Hall of Fame The New Yorker magazine cartoonist/illustrator Barry Blitt. Participation is limited.

Purchase Workshop Tickets

Location

The events are held at Winsted United Methodist Church, 630 Main Street, Winsted, CT.

Torts of the Future

Bruce Schneier, a fellow and lecturer at the Harvard Kennedy School, and the chief technology officer of the cybersecurity company Resilient, has an op-ed piece in the New York Times today, “What Happens When Your Car Gets Hacked?”1

In it, Schneier asks what will happen in five or ten years, when

the world is going to be filled with literally tens of billions of devices that hackers can attack. We’re going to see ransomware against our cars. Our digital video recorders and web cameras will be taken over by botnets. The data that these devices collect about us will be stolen and used to commit fraud. And we’re not going to be able to secure these devices.

After explaining the problem in some detail, he concludes, “the future will contain billions of orphaned devices connected to the web that simply have no engineers able to patch them.”

An this will be a problem. Here is the scenario Schneier lays out: “Imagine this: The company that made your internet-enabled door lock is long out of business. You have no way to secure yourself against the ransomware attack on that lock. Your only option, other than paying, and paying again when it’s reinfected, is to throw it away and buy a new one.”

Schneier calls for increased government intervention to mandate a variety of solutions to this problem.

Unfortunately, however, Schneier’s example doesn’t go far enough. Imagine your driverless car gets hacked, at 65 miles per hour. Who will be responsible for the ensuing injuries or deaths?

Fortunately, tort law is flexible enough to provide a remedy for those injured by technology run amok. But the courts will increasingly have to grapple with advances in technology which in turn lead to what we are calling “torts of the future.”